Nepal: Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2007
The US State Department’s 2007 Report on Nepal ’s human rights practices touches on Dalits:
Nepal: Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2007
Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor (March 11, 2008)
The following excerpts from the report relate to Dalits:
Societal Abuses and Discrimination
“Although prohibited by law, citizens practiced caste discrimination in a wide variety of religious, professional, government, and social environments, and such discrimination strongly influenced society.”
“On March 25, teachers prevented Dalit students of Fadke Dhunga Primary School , Parvat, to participate in the practical examination for a cooking class. After they were urged to do so by the District Education Office and the court, the teachers and school administration issued a public apology, paid compensation of $550 (35,000 rupees) to all of the students and permitted the Dalit students to take the exam.”
“On October 24, 13 Dalits of rural Tallosworad (Baitadi) were beaten allegedly by local villagers because they had refused to eat buffaloes slaughtered during a Hindu religious festival. Local villagers also looted goods worth approximately $7,900 (500,000 rupees) from Dalit-owned shops. Local mediation to resolve the case was eventually successful.”
“Also in Baitadi, following advocacy by OHCHR and Dalit organizations, for the first time the NP registered a FIR under discrimination charges against higher caste individuals for allegedly assaulting 12 Dalits after they refused to participate in traditional discriminatory practices during the Dashain festival.”
Elections and Political Participation
“At year’s end the interim constitution provided that the CA would consist of 601 members, with 240 elected by a first-past-the-post system, 335 by proportional representation, with quotas for Dalits, oppressed caste/indigenous ethnic groups, Madhesis, women, and other underrepresented groups, and 26 nominated by the cabinet.”
National/Racial/Ethnic Minorities
“Discrimination against lower castes and some ethnic groups, particularly Madhesis and Janajatis, was especially common in the Terai and in rural areas in the western part of the country, even though the government outlawed the public shunning of Dalits and made an effort to protect the rights of the disadvantaged castes. Economic, social, and educational advancement tended to be a function of historical patterns, geographic location, and caste. Better education and higher levels of prosperity, especially in the Kathmandu valley, were slowly reducing caste distinctions and increasing opportunities for lower socioeconomic groups. Better educated, urban-oriented castes continued to dominate politics and senior administrative and military positions, and to control a disproportionate share of natural resources.”
“Caste-based discrimination, including barring access to temples, is illegal; however, Dalits were occasionally barred from entering temples. Progress in reducing discrimination was more successful in urban areas.”
“Caste-based discrimination, including barring access to temples, is illegal”
Then why are temples allowed to place signs reading ‘HINDUS ONLY’ and then defining who is and isn’t Hindu based on nationality, i.e. caste? I am a white American Hindu convert married to a Nepali Hindu man. I formally converted to Hinduism through an Arya Samaj ceremony and have the certificate signed by the pandit to prove it; however I was barred entry to most temples including Pashupatinath simply based on my race and nationality - if this isn’t a human rights violation then I don’t know what is… A cow-eating Pakistani Muslim with no outward signs of Islam would have no problem entering I imagine… I guess ‘bideshis’ don’t count as human…